05/17/2006
Thoughts on Zuma
Just a few thoughts on our man of the moment (or should it be man of the year) regarding his recent acquittal and so-called “comeback”. Since getting back I’ve been checking out what was said in the local blogosphere and in media after trial. A posts that I would particularly like to highlight is from Commentary, I fully agree with the sentiments expressed therein, particularly the following by Laurence :
But I’m not going to second-guess the judge. I’m willing to accept that justice was done, the system worked, and Zuma isn’t a rapist. But he’s still a scumbag.
Lest we forget, Zuma put himself in this position. He was a cad. The self-styled head of South Africa’s “moral regeneration movement” took sexual advantage of a psychologically disturbed young woman who, by all accounts, thought of Zuma as a father-figure. During the trial, he enunciated the evil idea that women are “asking for it” in the way they dress; in this case, by wearing a knee-length skirt. Women’s groups are correct to call this a “setback”: in a country which already has one of the highest incidences of rape in the world, the damage Zuma did will take years to undo.
That sound you may have heard while reading the above quote was the hammer hitting the nail on the head! This perfectly summarizes exactly how I feel about the Z, he may try and put on his happy-go-lucky-uncle-who-just-loves-the-working-man face, but if you look beyond that, you begin to see the true Z – a selfish, egotistical clown who loves living the high life while all the time playing the populist card when it suits him.
But the rape trial is history.
It’s time for us to look ahead and consider what lies in store for the “indomitable” Z (and the rest of us), as he lurches forward towards his corruption trial. While I am sure he will be Yengenied, let’s consider the insane notion that he by some miracle actually gets off (even thinking of that gives me a bit of a heady feeling like I’m not getting enough air). There seems to be a fair bit of debate going on over whether the Z-man could actually go all the way to Tuinhuis…
There’s no way and the reason starts with an M and ends with a “you-don’t-mess-with-The-Legacy. Ever.”
That’s right, if the big man hasn’t put his stamp of approval on something, it will not happen. Many pundits have been commenting on the fact that the “battle-lines” have been drawn between Mbeki supporters and those that support Zuma. What kind of battle do these pundits have in mind – an insurgency by a small plucky band of Zuma loyalist, or perhaps a glorious charge light-brigade style to victory after the conclusion of the corruption trial? There’s no way - Zuma was history once Mbeki fired him from the Cabinet.
Much has been written of Zuma’s support base and the belief that this electrified band of clowns in arms will be at the vanguard of any Zuma victory. To this I have to say – what support? A bunch of disorganized and obsessed weirdo’s ranting outside the High Court, or maybe the ANCYL or Cosatu, or other so-called far leftists in the ANC?
The people outside the court were good and burning things and labeling people “bitches”, but I hardly feel they’ll carry much weight in the presidential succession debate. Then there is the ANCYL. Between organizing their 310th party of the year, laundering Brett Kebble’s cash and organizing their “babe magnet” cars I cannot think of one, not one initiative the ANCYL has ever managed to spearhead and carry through to its conclusion. Blowhards of the first order who never deliver.
As for Cosatu, their track record in influencing national debate has been anything but strong of late – remember the “stayaway to protest unemployment” last year - total flop. Plus remember Vavi spinning himself into oblivion in an attempt to explain how they were for JZ president, but not really. Brittle support at its best.
The final group is probably the strongest – the determined leftist within the tripartite alliance. Some might point to there show of strength last year at the acrimonious national conference, but to me this was not really about Zuma and all about Mbeki’s leadership style. The left, tired with being sidelined, caught Mbeki unawares and forced him to make concessions in an attempt to placate the base. This will not happen again.
Mbeki is probably SA’s canniest political animal. He has had a lot of practice from his time in exile to his in-house coup to become SA’s president after Madiba. If Zuma and motley crew of wannabe’s think they’re going to upset The Legacy, they’ve got another thing coming.
“Michael: Fredo, you're my older brother... and I love you...but don't ever take sides, with anyone, against the family again. Ever.” - Godfather (aka. T. Mbeki)
10:58 Posted in Politics | Permalink | Comments (6) | Email this


Comments
i hope you're right dude, but i fear it may be wishful thinking. if the bastard gets off on the corruption charges (quite probable, since much of the evidence used against shabir has been excluded) i think it will be very hard to stop him getting into tuinhuis.
ironically, its largely Mbeki's fault for centralising power in the ANC so much that the only way to express dissent against him is now to back JZ.
Posted by: duke | 05/17/2006
While I completely agree with you on the fact that Mbeki's leadership style has a lot to do with why the current crises began, I doubt very much that the Z's ascension will be a sure thing.
Everyone is focusing on him because he is the only apparent contender with his small, but boisterous team of hangers-on. I think once the Mbeki sponsored ANC centrist candidate steps up JZ and his rag tag group of "supporters" will be crushed by the much cannier Mbeki allies.
Posted by: someamongus | 05/18/2006
Our hatred of Jacob Zuma has blinded us to the fact that he enjoys a huge following within the rank and file membership of the ANC and its alliance partners.This fact has been demonstrated on a number of occasions,including on the day he was acquited of the rape charge.
However the most important show of strength was at last year`s national general council which among others forced the national executive committee to have Zuma reinstated to his position.
The Sunday national committee meeting had no choice but to allow him to resume his duties as deputy president.This will continue to be the turn of events at the 2007 ANC national conference when Zuma will emerge as president.
The focus will the be what the media,commentators,big business etc fear the most...THE ZUMA PRESIDENCY!
Such are the facts that our partisan media has failed to communicate to us so that we can brace ourselves for what is in store for us.
Posted by: molebatsi | 05/18/2006
As I noted above I think last years little tiff at the NGC was more about those disaffected with Mbeki's leadership style than it was about Zuma. Zuma was just the vehicle through which those who wanted to make a statement, could.
As to what happened on Sunday there is no doubt in my mind that Mbeki's strategy is to follow the old "keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer". He doesn't want Zuma outside the tent pissing in.
Posted by: someamongus | 05/20/2006
Thanks for a wonderful blog! As a complete outsider looking in i.e. fellow African who is VERY MUCH pro South African, I have only a few comments to make:
1) Jacob Zuma, MUST NOT, I repeat must not be allowed to ascend to the presidency. As it is now, SA is the lynch pin for a group of progressive, emerging economies on the continent struggling hard to elevate competence, accountability and productivity. There are far too many other examples of mediocrity and retrogression on the continent for South Africa to back slide.
2) I accept that Thabo Mbeki may have his faults, and indeed the South African miracle has not been even across all segments of the society HOWEVER let a competent candidate from the LEFT/SOCIALIST CAMP emerge with integrity and pragmatism who can spearhead their concerns. Jacob Zuma possesses neither of those qualities and the smartest thing the Mbeki camp can do, is expose his hypocrisy, greed and self interest for all to see.
3) The ANC must accept the inevitable. You cannot force a monolithic ideological consensus amongst Black South Africans. Let the opposing viewpoints coalesce around their distinct ideologies, and let them go their separate ways and compete in the public square based on the merits of their ideas. This is competitive politics and it is time for the ANC to mature under ideological differences of its members.
4) My last hope for shortcircuiting the ZUMA farce, is the great man himself. MADIBA. I am not sure who you refer to as M, but Mandela has the moral authority and stature to declare a ZUMA candidacy a non-starter. He has too much wisdom and integrity to see the makings of a Mugabe, Kamuzu Banda, Arap Moi, Mobutu, Abacha take root in SA. Here's hoping MADIBA is in good health and spirits to be the final arbiter on the matter. Zuma has the right to pursue his candidacy, but intervening forces are needed to prevent a disaster for the country.
Posted by: Sijui | 05/26/2006
Continue your commenting at www.someamongus.com
Posted by: someamongus | 06/03/2006
The comments are closed.